🔗 Share this article

This is somewhat awkward to admit, but let me explain. Several books sit beside my bed, each incompletely finished. Inside my smartphone, I'm midway through over three dozen audiobooks, which pales compared to the forty-six ebooks I've left unfinished on my e-reader. This fails to count the growing collection of advance editions next to my side table, vying for endorsements, now that I work as a established novelist personally.

Starting with Persistent Finishing to Deliberate Abandonment

Initially, these stats might appear to support contemporary opinions about modern attention spans. A writer observed recently how easy it is to distract a individual's concentration when it is fragmented by online networks and the 24-hour news. The author suggested: “It could be as people's concentration change the writing will have to adjust with them.” Yet as an individual who previously would persistently finish any novel I picked up, I now view it a human right to put down a story that I'm not connecting with.

The Short Span and the Glut of Choices

I don't feel that this practice is caused by a brief attention span – instead it relates to the feeling of existence slipping through my fingers. I've often been impressed by the Benedictine principle: “Keep death daily in view.” Another point that we each have a mere limited time on this planet was as sobering to me as to others. But at what previous moment in our past have we ever had such instant entry to so many mind-blowing works of art, at any moment we want? A wealth of options greets me in each library and on any device, and I want to be purposeful about where I direct my energy. Could “DNF-ing” a novel (term in the publishing industry for Did Not Finish) be not a sign of a weak focus, but a thoughtful one?

Reading for Empathy and Self-awareness

Especially at a time when publishing (and therefore, commissioning) is still controlled by a specific demographic and its issues. Although engaging with about individuals distinct from us can help to develop the capacity for compassion, we furthermore select stories to think about our individual experiences and position in the universe. Unless the works on the shelves more accurately represent the experiences, realities and interests of prospective individuals, it might be quite hard to keep their attention.

Modern Storytelling and Reader Interest

Of course, some writers are actually successfully crafting for the “modern attention span”: the concise writing of some recent novels, the focused sections of others, and the quick sections of several contemporary books are all a impressive example for a briefer approach and method. And there is an abundance of author tips designed for capturing a reader: hone that opening line, improve that start, elevate the tension (more! more!) and, if writing thriller, place a victim on the beginning. Such suggestions is completely good – a possible agent, publisher or reader will use only a several limited minutes choosing whether or not to continue. There's no point in being obstinate, like the writer on a workshop I joined who, when confronted about the narrative of their manuscript, stated that “it all becomes clear about 75% of the way through”. Not a single author should subject their follower through a sequence of 12 labours in order to be grasped.

Writing to Be Accessible and Granting Space

But I do write to be understood, as much as that is feasible. Sometimes that needs leading the audience's hand, guiding them through the story beat by economical point. At other times, I've realised, insight takes patience – and I must allow my own self (along with other creators) the permission of meandering, of adding depth, of deviating, until I find something true. One thinker argues for the story discovering new forms and that, rather than the standard plot structure, “different structures might enable us envision innovative ways to make our stories alive and true, persist in creating our books fresh”.

Change of the Book and Modern Platforms

Accordingly, each opinions align – the story may have to adapt to fit the today's audience, as it has constantly achieved since it originated in the historical period (as we know it currently). Perhaps, like previous writers, coming writers will go back to serialising their novels in newspapers. The next such writers may currently be releasing their content, chapter by chapter, on online platforms such as those used by millions of monthly users. Creative mediums evolve with the period and we should permit them.

More Than Brief Focus

Yet we should not say that any changes are completely because of shorter concentration. Were that true, brief fiction anthologies and very short stories would be considered far more {commercial|profitable|marketable